Confusion Matrix in cybersecurity
Confusion Matrix in Machine Learning-
The confusion matrix is a matrix used to determine the performance of the classification models for a given set of test data. It can only be determined if the true values for test data are known. The matrix itself can be easily understood, but the related terminologies may be confusing. Since it shows the errors in the model performance in the form of a matrix, hence also known as an error matrix.
- For the 2 prediction classes of classifiers, the matrix is of 2*2 table, for 3 classes, it is 3*3 table, and so on.
- The matrix is divided into two dimensions, that are predicted values and actual values along with the total number of predictions.
- Predicted values are those values, which are predicted by the model, and actual values are the true values for the given observations.
- It looks like the below table:
The above table has the following cases:
- True Negative: Model has given prediction No, and the real or actual value was also No.
- True Positive: The model has predicted yes, and the actual value was also true.
- False Negative: The model has predicted no, but the actual value was Yes, it is also called as Type-II error.
- False Positive: The model has predicted Yes, but the actual value was No. It is also called a Type-I error.
Need for Confusion Matrix in Machine learning
- It evaluates the performance of the classification models, when they make predictions on test data, and tells how good our classification model is.
- It not only tells the error made by the classifiers but also the type of errors such as it is either type-I or type-II error.
- With the help of the confusion matrix, we can calculate the different parameters for the model, such as accuracy, precision, etc.
Example: We can understand the confusion matrix using an example.
Suppose we are trying to create a model that can predict the result for the disease that is either a person has that disease or not. So, the confusion matrix for this is given as:
From the above example, we can conclude that:
- The table is given for the two-class classifier, which has two predictions “Yes” and “NO.” Here, Yes defines that patient has the disease, and No defines that patient does not has that disease.
- The classifier has made a total of 100 predictions. Out of 100 predictions, 89 are true predictions, and 11 are incorrect predictions.
- The model has given prediction “yes” for 32 times, and “No” for 68 times. Whereas the actual “Yes” was 27, and actual “No” was 73 times.
New technologies create new criminal opportunities but few new types of crime. What distinguishes cybercrime from traditional criminal activity? Obviously, one difference is the use of the digital computer, but technology alone is insufficient for any distinction that might exist between different realms of criminal activity. Criminals do not need a computer to commit fraud, traffic in child pornography and intellectual property, steal an identity, or violate someone’s privacy. All those activities existed before the “cyber” prefix became ubiquitous. Cybercrime, especially involving the Internet, represents an extension of existing criminal behaviour alongside some novel illegal activities.
Hence it needs to be tackled, here confusion matrix plays its role.
Cybersecurity and Confusion Matrix
The rapid increase in connectivity and accessibility of computer system has resulted frequent chances for cyber attacks. Attack on the computer infrastructures are becoming an increasingly Serious problem. Basically the cyber attack detection is a classification problem, in which we classify the normal pattern from the abnormal pattern (attack) of the system. Subset selection decision fusion method plays a key role in cyber attack detection. It has been shown that redundant and/or irrelevant features may severely affect the accuracy of learning algorithms. The SDF is very powerful and popular data mining algorithm for decision-making and classification problems. It has been using in many real life applications like medical diagnosis, radar signal classification, weather prediction, credit approval, and fraud detection etc.
KDD CUP ‘’99 Data Set Description
To check performance of the proposed algorithm for distributed cyber attack detection and classification, we can evaluate it practically using KDD’99 intrusion detection datasets. In KDD99 dataset these four attack classes (DoS, U2R,R2L, and probe) are divided into 22 different attack classes that tabulated in Table I. The 1999 KDD datasets are divided into two parts: the training dataset and the testing dataset. The testing dataset contains not only known attacks from the training data but also unknown attacks. Since 1999, KDD’99 has been the most wildly used data set for the evaluation of anomaly detection methods. This data set is prepared by Stolfo et al. and is built based on the data captured in DARPA’98 IDS evaluation program . DARPA’98 is about 4 gigabytes of compressed raw (binary) tcpdump data of 7 weeks of network traffic, which can be processed into about 5 million connection records, each with about 100 bytes. For each TCP/IP connection, 41 various quantitative (continuous data type) and qualitative (discrete data type) features were extracted among the 41 features, 34 features (numeric) and 7 features (symbolic). To analysis the different results, there are standard metrics that have been developed for evaluating network intrusion detections. Detection Rate (DR) and false alarm rate are the two most famous metrics that have already been used. DR is computed as the ratio between the number of correctly detected attacks and the total number of attacks, while false alarm (false positive) rate is computed as the ratio between the number of normal connections that is incorrectly misclassified as attacks and the total number of normal connections.
In the KDD Cup 99, the criteria used for evaluation of the participant entries is the Cost Per Test (CPT) computed using the confusion matrix and a given cost matrix. A Confusion Matrix (CM) is a square matrix in which each column corresponds to the predicted class, while rows correspond to the actual classes. An entry at row i and column j, CM (i, j), represents the number of misclassified instances that originally belong to class i, although incorrectly identified as a member of class j. The entries of the primary diagonal, CM (i, i), stand for the number of properly detected instances. Cost matrix is similarly defined, as well, and entry C (i, j) represents the cost penalty for misclassifying an instance belonging to class i into class j.
- True Positive (TP): The amount of attack detected when it is actually attack.
- True Negative (TN): The amount of normal detected when it is actually normal.
- False Positive (FP): The amount of attack detected when it is actually normal (False alarm).
- False Negative (FN): The amount of normal detected when it is actually attack.
In the confusion matrix above, rows correspond to predicted categories, while columns correspond to actual categories.
Confusion matrix contains information actual and predicted classifications done by a classifier. The performance of cyber attack detection system is commonly evaluated using the data in a matrix.